
- Starring
- Bob Odenkirk, Diedrich Bader, Shannon DeVido
- Creators
- Paul Lieberstein, Aaron Zelman
- Rating
- TV-14
- Genre
- Comedy, Drama
- Where to watch
- AMC+
- Release days
- Sundays
Overall Score
Rating Overview
Rating Summary
Lucky Hank tells the tale of the dissolutioned, middle-aged English professor Hank Devereaux, Jr., played by Bob Odenkirk, who’s beginning to feel the weight of his life decisions.
Lucky Hank (S1:E1 – Pilot)
The pilot episode introduces us to Hank’s life and those within it. Chair of a middling English department at a second-rate university, he’s universally disliked by peers and students alike. He’s married to a perfect woman who’s had enough of him, and he’s a so-so father, as well as a son to a vastly more successful father who abandoned him when Hank was only 14 years of age.
Understandably, Hank is a miserable man who has given up on life. Unfortunately, his commitment to misery isn’t full enough to be interesting, and that seems to be the show’s modus operandi. The writers are unable or unwilling to pick a lane. Neither the premise, the characters, nor the dialogue is zany enough to be a parody or farce, nor is it solemn enough to be a serious drama. Instead, in its effort to walk the line and be all things, it ends up being nothing.
It is a show consisting of unlikeable characters who are in an unlikable profession at an unlikable place of work. Not even the prodigious talent of Bob Odenkirk is enough to save the pilot episode from this ennui gone bad.
However, it is the pilot episode, and it is Bob Odenkirk. Also, the creators and writers mostly have pretty good pedigrees. So, I’ll give it one more episode to see if it’s worth continuing with the series.
Lucky Hank (S1:E2 – George Saunders)
This was a moderate improvement over its predecessor. The pacing was punchier, and the emotional through-line was more identifiable, making Odenkirk’s Hank a more sympathetic character. It’s unfortunate, then, that the show continues to suffer from an identity crisis.
It boasts some incredible comedic talent both in front of and behind the camera: veteran comedy writers from The Office, The Bernie Mac Show, and The King of the Hill, 50% of the Farrelly brothers directed the first two episodes, and the cast includes Diedrick Bader and Cedric Yarbrough.
How is it, then, that it’s such a boring and unfunny program? It’s as though those involved are intentionally trying to make it pretentious just to prove that they can, and just when you think you can’t take it anymore, there’s a random (and unfunny) d!@k joke tossed in.
I recently saw Bob Odenkirk on Hot Ones, and he mentions how “exhausting” it was to inhabit the mind of Saul Goodman for six seasons and, by contrast, what a relief Hank Devereaux is, ostensibly due to the character’s simplicity and lower energy.
Weeeellll, that’s kind of a problem. The show is filled with uninteresting characters suffering from everyday problems suffered by those of us in the real world. So if its lead character is also realistically bland and uninteresting, why would anyone want to watch it? Most of us watch TV in an effort to escape reality, going full-realtard only serves to remind us of our own tedious lives.
That being said, Bob Odenkirk’s past brilliance, in conjunction with some hints of Lucky Hank’s trajectory provided by this episode, will keep me plugged in for at least one more. However, I highly suggest that, if you haven’t yet started this series, you let me take the next one for the team. Right now, Lucky Hank isn’t worth a whole lot.
Lucky Hank (S1:E3 – Escape)

For all of its flaws, I think that there might be a show here that is worth watching. In this episode, the secondary characters were given very limited screen time, which gave us more time with Hank. As anyone who has watched Mr. Show, Breaking Bad, or Better Call Saul knows, more screen time with Bob Odenkirk is a good thing.
However, it’s doubly good in this series because its biggest problem in the first two episodes was its lack of identity. It didn’t know if it was a screwball comedy or a serious yet sarcastic drama, and it unsuccessfully tried to be both. By excluding the ill-defined supporting cast, the show’s direction and focus were made sharper. Furthermore, this episode was much more emotionally accessible, featuring themes that extend beyond the elitism of academia.
That being said, the series still has quite a bit of tightening up to do. There was still some goofy music playing in a scene that didn’t warrant it, and the seemingly random voiceover needs to either stop or commit and become much more prevalent. In either case, it’s not working right now, as it comes out of nowhere. Furthermore, the writers need to decide if we should be laughing at the students or identifying with their grievances because, as it stands right now, they are obnoxious and ridiculous, but taken seriously.
As it stands, they are getting another episode out of me, but I strongly suggest that you wait to watch until I’m done with the series unless it suddenly leaps ahead in quality. In its current state, it’s still not worth starting.
Lucky Hank (S1:E4 – The Goose Boxer)
Despite myself, Lucky Hank is beginning to grow on me, which really stinks because I don’t actually like it. Most of the supporting characters are still trash and need to be cut. So, when the last episode’s main subplot was about Hank needing to cut a quarter of his department and his seeming ambivalence toward it, I was immediately on board. Regrettably, that was all undone with this episode, and it looks like the series will be keeping them for the time being.
So, how is it that I can make the claim that a show that I don’t like is growing on me? The answer is actually pretty simple: Bob Odenkirk. He’s managed to make me care about Hank’s well-being and growth as a person, despite the fact that I don’t like anybody else in the series (Diedrich Bader notwithstanding) or care about a single thing that happens at the school, Odenkirk keeps me going.
That being said, it’s still not a worthwhile program to start, and I’m not convinced that it ever will be. However, I’m halfway through the season so far, so I might as well stick it out. Stay tuned to see if you should tune in.
Lucky Hank (S1:E5 – The Clock)
The Clock takes place almost completely during an annual dinner party for the university’s English department. As the chair of the department, Hank and his wife host it at their house. So, we are treated to 45 minutes of the most banal English department in North America (and that’s saying something). Fortunately, the setting is perfect for making the audience as uncomfortable as the cast, which is the point. Blessedly, it works.
Episode 5 is the first of the series to actually be good. It has the clearest and most focused theme and plot, as well as the most consistent and satisfying emotional through-line. However, even though the show may have finally found itself, the primary problems still exist.
The series centers on a middling English department within a mediocre university located in a mundane town. So, with all that boring in one’s show, it would probably be a good idea to include interesting characters. They did not.
The only profession with less utility than an English professor would have to be a poetry professor. This show has two of them, and, while it’s aware that they are jokes, the jokes surrounding them almost always fall flat, with the writers unwilling to commit to their mediocrity. In fact, the only character worth a damn, other than those played by Bob Odenkirk and Diedrich Bader, is Shannon DeVido’s Emma, and that’s because she seems to be the only character who understands how useless both she and everyone else is. Also, she has a wonderfully dry delivery that gives her character an amount of charm that is sorely missing from most of the rest of the cast.
While I’m happy to no longer feel as though I’m subjecting myself to torture, I’m still not able to recommend this series as Worth it.
WOKE REPORT
You're Only Getting Half the Picture.
This section is our site's secret sauce, and what truly separates us from the rest. If you don't read it, you haven't read our review.
Help us fight the Woke Mind Virus. Join today.
James Carrick
James Carrick is a passionate film enthusiast with a degree in theater and philosophy. James approaches dramatic criticism from a philosophic foundation grounded in aesthetics and ethics, offering insight and analysis that reveals layers of cinematic narrative with a touch of irreverence and a dash of snark.






No comments yet.
No audience reviews yet. Be the first to leave one.